From 5bb0d8749336256cc0a4ac58517f8257d81c5b35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Jakob L. Kreuze" <zerodaysfordays@sdf.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2026 09:00:38 -0500
Subject: Stylize post-publication asides

---
 posts/analyzing-executable-size-part-0.org | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'posts/analyzing-executable-size-part-0.org')

diff --git a/posts/analyzing-executable-size-part-0.org b/posts/analyzing-executable-size-part-0.org
index aa65f9f..ba49811 100644
--- a/posts/analyzing-executable-size-part-0.org
+++ b/posts/analyzing-executable-size-part-0.org
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 #+TAGS: writeup programming operating-systems c linux
 
 #+BEGIN_EXPORT html
-<header class="article-front-matter article-warning">
+<aside class="legacy-warning">
   <p>This was intended to be a series describing trends in programming language
     technology and how they relate to an increase in the average size of
     executable files. It never materialized beyond this initial post.
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
     runtime and is therefore larger. I don't think it's as much of a problem as
     folks make it out to be, and my past self seems to be somewhat cognizant of
     that.</p>
-</header>
+</aside>
 #+END_EXPORT
 
 It seems that static linking is back in style, or at least popular among all the
-- 
cgit v1.3